Sosa’s Responses to Dreaming Skepticism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
BonJour’s Abductivist Reply to Skepticism
According to the abductivist reply to skepticism, the continuity, coherence and repeatable regularities found in our sensory experiences cry out for explanation. Abductivists claim the best explanation of these features of our experience is that they reflect objective regularities in the world. They maintain that the hypothesis that our sense experiences are caused by objects having roughly the...
متن کاملResponse to “Skepticism about desert”
Swartzer concludes the paper with the claim that desert is not a basic normative notion. It cannot “supply first principles of justice.” (p. 1) In other words, desert is to be defined in terms of justice, not the other way around. What we deserve just is what we are to receive according to the demands of justice. On this view, to say that a just distribution of goods is such that everyone recei...
متن کاملAll Sense-Perceptions Are True: Epicurean Responses to Skepticism and Relativism
Epicurean epistemology is infamous for the claim that all sense-perceptions are true. 1 This is how Lucretius puts it: what is perceived by any of the senses at any given time is true ( De Rerum Natura [ DRN ] 4.499). This claim—which I shall call SPT—seems deeply misguided. It appears obvious that sense-perception can err. The plan for this chapter is to show that SPT is a sophisticated philos...
متن کاملDreaming
and reasoning, is capable of suggesting, if not establishing, far-reaching laws of cerebral activity, inasmuch as the brain energies revealed by consciousness, and sometimes attested by objective manifestations, occur while the organ is out of relation with any impressions derived from the outer world, and is left, so to write, to its spontaneous and uncontrolled motions. Dreaming has been attr...
متن کاملSpontaneous skepticism: the interplay of motivation and expectation in responses to favorable and unfavorable medical diagnoses.
The quantity of processing view of motivated reasoning predicts that individuals are more likely to spontaneously question the validity of unfavorable than favorable feedback even when the objective likelihood of the feedback is equivalent. Participants were videotaped self-administering a bogus medical test revealing either a favorable or an unfavorable result. In Studies 1 and 2, unfavorable ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Crítica (México D. F. En línea)
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1870-4905,0011-1503
DOI: 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2010.868